How would you improve AI accuracy in production?
### Signal to interviewer
I can improve AI accuracy systematically by tying quality work to production telemetry and root-cause ownership.
### Clarify
I would clarify what accuracy means for the product, which cohorts are highest risk, and acceptable latency/cost impact.
### Approach
Run a production error reduction loop: detect failures, classify root causes, ship targeted fixes, and validate with shadow/live checks.
### Metrics & instrumentation
Primary metric: verified correctness rate in production samples. Secondary metrics: error recurrence, correction turnaround time, and confidence calibration quality. Guardrails: latency drift, over-refusal rate, and unresolved severe failure buckets.
### Tradeoffs
Heavier validation increases correctness but adds latency and spend. Faster response paths improve UX but can miss subtle errors.
### Risks & mitigations
Risk: noisy feedback signals; mitigate with weighted labeling. Risk: overfitting to known errors; mitigate with rotating eval sets. Risk: ownership gaps; mitigate with root-cause SLAs.
### Example
In a policy assistant, retrieval-related inaccuracies are tracked as a separate class with dedicated freshness and citation fixes.
### 90-second version
Improve production accuracy through a root-cause loop, not one-off tuning. Measure verified correctness, assign ownership by error class, and balance validation depth with latency constraints.
- How is verified correctness measured for your product domain?
- Which error class currently causes the most user harm?
- How would you design shadow validation before production fixes?
- What ownership SLAs should each error category carry?