Design an AI copilot for data analysts.
### Signal to interviewer
I can design analyst AI that accelerates insight generation while preserving data correctness and trust.
### Clarify
I would clarify analyst persona, data stack, governance requirements, and common analysis workflows.
### Approach
Build a query-to-insight assembly: intent parsing, SQL generation with safety checks, result validation, and narrative/chart synthesis.
### Metrics & instrumentation
Primary metric: time-to-validated-insight. Secondary metrics: query correction rate, reusable analysis templates, and dashboard publishing velocity. Guardrails: semantic SQL errors, metric-definition drift, and unsupported narrative claims.
### Tradeoffs
More automation reduces manual effort but can increase hidden analytical mistakes. More transparency improves confidence but adds extra interaction steps.
### Risks & mitigations
Risk: wrong joins or filters; mitigate with schema-aware planners. Risk: hallucinated narrative claims; mitigate with source-linked statements. Risk: overreliance by junior analysts; mitigate with explainable reasoning panels.
### Example
For revenue analysis, AI proposes SQL for cohort retention, flags missing date filters, and generates annotated charts tied to validated result sets.
### 90-second version
Design analyst copilots for speed plus verifiability. Keep SQL and assumptions inspectable, enforce guardrails, and measure validated insight throughput as the core outcome.
- Which analyst workflow is highest leverage for first release?
- What counts as a validated insight in your organization?
- How would you implement semantic checks for generated SQL?
- What lineage model links narratives back to query outputs?