Design AI features for YouTube (discovery, creators, and moderation).
### Signal to interviewer
I can design platform AI using multi-sided incentives instead of single-metric optimization.
### Clarify
I would clarify product priorities across viewer retention, creator growth, and moderation risk tolerance.
### Approach
Apply a balance matrix: discovery ranking, creator copilot features, and safety moderation integrated through shared policy and feedback loops.
### Metrics & instrumentation
Primary metric: quality-adjusted watch-time. Secondary metrics: creator growth consistency, recommendation diversity, and moderation precision/recall. Guardrails: harmful exposure rate, creator fairness imbalance, and false takedown volume.
### Tradeoffs
Aggressive personalization boosts engagement but narrows exploration. Strict moderation lowers risk but can suppress legitimate content.
### Risks & mitigations
Risk: recommendation echo chambers; mitigate with diversity quotas. Risk: creator distrust in moderation; mitigate with explainable decisions. Risk: abusive content evasion; mitigate with adaptive classifiers plus human review.
### Example
For educational channels, AI boosts discoverability through topic-intent matching while moderation distinguishes expert critique from harmful misinformation patterns.
### 90-second version
Design YouTube AI as a balanced ecosystem engine: optimize discovery, empower creators, and enforce safety with transparent guardrails and multi-objective metrics.
- Which side of the marketplace is currently most constrained?
- How should quality watch-time be adjusted for low-value engagement loops?
- How would you build creator fairness monitoring into ranking?
- What escalation policy handles moderation gray-zone content?